Your Comment Needed to Stop Line 5

Earlier this month, in eight hours of public comment, the Army Corps heard our call loud and clear: reject  permits for Line 5. Hundreds of people turned out in Ashland, Wisconsin because of their concerns for the Great Lakes! Comments at the hearing were overwhelmingly (2-1) supported the shutdown of Line 5. 

Dan Wiggins Jr. of the Bad River Band speaking at a press conference behind a sign that says "Shut Down Line 5". Photo credit: Devon Cupery

Photo credit: Devon Cupery

Now it’s your time to add your voice.  

Submit your comment written on a blue background

 

 

Click here to submit your comment and add a personal note to the Army Corps.

Want more help putting together your comments? Have questions about the pipeline? Want a yard sign? Want to meet others who care about these issues? 

Join us for a comment-writing pop-up! We’re hosting pop-ups around the state to help people write comments, give you materials to help collect more comments, and answer any questions you may have about Line 5. Stop in and get a yard sign too!

Map of Line 5 comment pop-ups

June 25- Eau Claire
June 25- La Crosse
June 26- Appleton
June 26- Green Bay
June 27- Milwaukee
July 16- Kenosha
TBD- Ashland, Superior

Don’t see a house party near you? Fill out this form for a packet of materials so you an host your own comment-writing party!
When the Evers Administration held a comment period on the Line 5 pipeline, they received over 30,000 comments.  Let's do that again and show that the movement to shut down Line 5 is growing.

This is an opportunity to tell the Army Corps and the entire Biden Administration about your concerns around Line 5. This pipeline, run by a multi-billion dollar corporation, Enbridge, is moving oil dangerously through northern Wisconsin every day in illegal trespass, violating the Bad River Band's sovereignty. 

Enbridge is trying to expand the pipeline and operate it for years to come, putting the nearby water, plants, animals and communities at risk of an oil spill. Construction of a reroute threatens major damages in itself, and would extend the risk to the Great Lakes for decades.
 


Related content: