The Past, Present, and Contested Future of LNG Terminals Along the Gulf Coast

Gas export terminals have hollowed out communities in Texas and Louisiana—but some residents are fighting back

By Delaney Nolan

Photos by Julie Dermansky

December 14, 2024

Story by Delaney Nolan

Photos by Julie Dermansky

Produced by Geoff McGhee

Seated on the porch of his home in Lake Charles, Louisiana, Solomon Williams Jr. began to unwind time. While his daughter chattered in his lap, Williams conjured up memories of Cameron, the Gulf Coast town 50 miles to the south where he was raised, where his father and uncles once oystered and fished for pogy. He didn’t talk about Cameron as it is now. He talked of Cameron as it used to be.

He started with food. “They had the best sausage and boudin and tassos there, man,” he recalled. Boudin is rice-stuffed sausage, a staple of Cajun cuisine; tasso, a smoky, spicy cut of pork that flavors dishes like gumbo. “Man, you stop in Cameron and eat that tasso one time—you come all the way from Houston to get that tasso, it’s so good.”

Solomon Williams standing by a boat.

Solomon Williams Jr. recalled when Cameron was a vibrant community, “but LNG done closed all that off.”

Williams, a longtime opponent of oil and gas development, still pops down to Cameron. The hour-long drive takes him through coastal prairie, through freshwater marsh and old rice fields that run wild. The ridge of land between the marsh and the Gulf of Mexico remains a refuge for thousands of migratory birds: mallards and long-legged egrets, roseate spoonbills, and black-crowned night herons. Once he’s in town, all he sees are ghosts. Here, the juke joint where he danced as a young man. There, Schoolboy’s bar, where he and his friends used to play pool. The grocery store. The gas station. The library. Almost all of it is gone now. “It was beautiful down there,” Williams said, sighing. “Really beautiful. But LNG done closed all that off. . . . There’s nothing there anymore.”

Graphic showing locations and sizes of LNG terminals in Louisiana and Texas.

Sources: Alison Kirsch, Johanna Heureaux-Torres, Sierra Club US LNG Export Tracker (LNG terminal projects); US Energy Information Administration (LNG export data); Mapbox, Open Street Map and Maxar (base map and satellite imagery); Graphic: Geoff McGhee for Sierra

In less than a decade, Cameron has become the epicenter of the largest methane gas boom in history. As recently as the Obama era, the United States didn’t export any LNG—that is, liquefied natural gas, methane that has been supercooled and compressed so that it can be shipped overseas in massive tankers. But then the fracking boom and a glut of domestically produced methane changed everything. Today, the US is the world’s biggest exporter of LNG. A single company—Venture Global—is poised to ship more LNG annually than does the entire nation of Qatar. Five massive LNG terminals are already in operation across the Gulf Coast. Five others are under construction, and another 12 are in some stage of permitting or pending approval. All of them are, to some degree, contested by local residents.

A view of Cameron, Louisiana, showing a water tower at center.

Cameron, Louisiana.

Williams remembers when Cameron’s first terminal, Sabine Pass, started exporting LNG in 2016. He knew from the start that it would be trouble. The largest LNG facility in the nation sprawls across more than 1,000 acres of former marshland: It contains six liquefaction units, three berths for giant ships, and 17 billion cubic feet of storage capacity. Other effects are harder to see. Air pollution and particulate matter from ozone are estimated to contribute to 19 premature deaths in the area each year.

The LNG expansion harms not just Cameron but the planet as a whole. If all the planned LNG projects were to be built, their combined annual emissions would be equivalent to those of 695 coal-fired plants—or some 646 million gasoline-powered cars. A study published in the fall by a professor at Cornell University found that, due to high rates of methane leakage from pipelines and flare stacks, exported LNG produces 33 percent more emissions than coal. In an LNG-soaked world, we could blow past the 2°C threshold by the time Williams’s five-year-old daughter is old enough to order a beer.

Last January, President Joe Biden made one of the most consequential environmental moves of his presidency when the Department of Energy announced a pause on pending and new applications to export LNG to countries that don’t have a free trade agreement with the United States. Since then—even as the federal courts and the administration have gone back and forth about the scope of the pause—environmental advocates across the Gulf Coast have known that the ultimate fate of the pause would be determined by the 2024 election. On November 5, LNG opponents’ fears came to pass when Donald Trump was elected as president for a second time.

During the campaign, Trump pledged to unleash US oil and gas production on his “very first day back.” Near the top of Trump’s to-do list will be a reversal of the pause on LNG exports—a major priority for his corporate backers, including the Natural Gas Supply Association and the American Petroleum Institute. The revolving door that shuttles personnel from industry to government will likely usher LNG proponents back into power. Shaylyn Hynes, for example, was the Department of Energy press secretary during Trump’s first administration, then became Venture Global’s senior VP of public affairs, and may very well return to government service again to advance Trump’s vision of fossil fuel dominance.

While an intensified oil and gas boom would be welcomed by corporate executives, it would almost certainly accelerate the hollowing out of communities located near LNG facilities. Since Sabine Pass LNG began operating, Cameron Parish has lost about 30 percent of its population. Many people left after Hurricane Laura pounded the area in 2020, but one major reason they didn’t come back was that the parish had little money to rebuild, since the state and the parish had showered Venture Global with tax benefits. “Even if the people wanted to go back to Cameron, they couldn’t,” Williams said, pointing to the difficulty of basic tasks like buying groceries and filling a prescription.

A hurricane-damaged gas station in Cameron.

A tattered flag waves in front of temporary housing.

A gas station, left, sits empty in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, which has lost nearly a third of its population in the last decade. A flag, right, is the worse for wear after a storm in Cameron Parish.

When Williams talks of Cameron’s past, he also conjures the possible futures of other Gulf Coast communities. A tour of towns hosting LNG facilities—places like Port Sulphur, Louisiana, and Brownsville, Texas—reveals similar signs of decline, patterns so identical that they begin to appear less like isolated impacts and more like something endemic to LNG development, like the advancing stages of an aggressive disease.

In stage I, the building begins. The massive construction projects bring in trucks by the hundreds and send clouds of concrete dust billowing into nearby marshes. Acres of biodiverse wetlands are drained, leveled, and paved over.

In stage II, the intense demands of the plant begin to strain infrastructure: Water runs short, traffic gets worse, and medical services become stretched thin and harder to access. Dredging to make berths and sea channels for the massive tankers contributes to the fragile land’s erosion. Shrimpers and fishers get pushed out. Residents begin to murmur about leaving.

Stage III—that looks like Cameron.

A run down shack seen on the streets of Cameron.

Cameron, Louisiana.

Photograph of former church in Cameron, Louisiana.

Cemetery in Cameron with Christ on a Cross overlooking headstones.

Stage III: Cameron

On a sticky August day, Williams and about 50 others—mostly fishers and shrimpers—stood around the Cameron harbor and pumped each other up for a Louisiana Department of Environment Quality public hearing. Near the water’s edge, a table was loaded with boudin, but the attendees—Black and white, old and young—were too focused or too nervous to eat. “Be mad,” boomed Alyssa Portaro, an organizer with Fishermen Involved in Sustaining Our Heritage. “They have allowed this to happen.”

The “they” she referred to was Venture Global.

The company’s Calcasieu Pass terminal is already operating in Cameron.

Venture Global has plans for a second, called CP2.

A short drive away are Sempra’s Cameron LNG.

And Cheniere’s Sabine Pass.

Altogether, that’s over four square miles of gas terminals.

Venture Global has racked up thousands of permit deviations during the past three years, and the hearing was being held as part of the company’s request for new permits that would allow it to pollute the air even more. The company was seeking permission to emit 30 percent more carbon monoxide, over 40 percent more benzene, and 500 percent more lead. As one local put it, that’s like getting caught for speeding and then asking the state to raise the speed limit.

The hearing began in the Cameron Parish Police Jury building, and speakers approached the podium one by one.

“I own the last remaining shrimp house in Hackberry,” Melissa Richard said. “Shrimpers are suffering.”

“Inland fishing has gone to nothing,” another fisher echoed. “[The LNG industry] has put us out of business. I’ve lived here my whole life, and I don’t want to anymore.”

A shrimp boat with nets raised.

Shrimpers have been among the most vocal opponents of the Gulf LNG terminals.

“My whole family died of cancer, diabetes, respiratory problems,” Deborah Ramirez said. Ramirez is a kind of Louisiana sibyl: Her hometown of Mossville was also depopulated by petrochemical development, shrinking from hundreds of residents to just a handful. Last summer, she was arrested in her wheelchair in front of the Citi headquarters in New York City while protesting the bank’s funding of Gulf LNG projects. “We can have jobs,” Ramirez added. “We don’t have to die about it.”

Many residents of Cameron have found the gas giant to be a lousy neighbor. John Allaire lives across the shipping channel from Calcasieu Pass, and from his place he documents gas flaring nearly every day. A retired engineer, Allaire gathers data in part because there are no air monitors in Cameron. “There’s no infrastructure over here in Cameron,” he said. “There’s the Shell station and a bar or two, a taco truck.” As Venture Global’s construction pushed fishers off the docks, the company agreed to install a new boat ramp, but it was poorly constructed, Allaire said. “Venture Global wasn’t gonna spend a nickel more on this parish than they could get away with.”

John Allaire, a Cameron resident.

John Allaire, a Cameron resident, complained that Venture Global “wasn’t gonna spend a nickel more on this parish than they could get away with.”

Some of Cameron’s decline can be attributed to a string of major hurricanes that battered the area and made it increasingly unlivable. Dustin Granger, who grew up in neighboring Calcasieu Parish and once ran for state treasurer, argues that rebuilding could have happened—were the LNG industry not receiving massive tax breaks through the state’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program. “We still haven’t rebuilt our infrastructure,” Granger said. “There’s just so much stuff that [tax money] could fix.”

Last year, the state approved over $184 million in tax breaks for Venture Global’s operations in Cameron alone. And that’s just one year of tax breaks; they will likely extend over five years. “We basically pay these industries to come here and extract value from our area,” Granger argued, and as a result, “it’s practically been wiped out and turned into an industrial wasteland.”

A trailer with a sign reading “Shrimp Ice Live Crabs”

A swamped schoolbus resting in a puddle, bearing a local hotel’s logo.

Aerial shot of residential area of Cameron showing mostly mobile homes.

Cameron, Louisiana, from the air.

Even as local services crumble under the pressures of severe storms and a shrinking tax base, the multibillion-dollar facilities generally enjoy the support of local and state politicians in Louisiana, who often have ties to industry. Governor Jeff Landry’s chief of staff is a former Venture Global lobbyist. A Landry-owned firm was involved in the construction of Cameron LNG. The president of the Cameron Parish Police Jury, Ronald Nunez, is an employee at the facility.

Jennifer Jones is the only member of her high school graduating class who still lives in Cameron. Her family has long roots in the area; when her ancestors arrived in 1840, they became the first permanent white settlers among the Atakapa people. Jones, in her seventies, recently retired from practicing law after the family office was taken out by a storm. Everyone is moving inland, she said. “My sister has not come for Christmas since [Hurricane] Laura, because she’s afraid to come where there’s no medical care.”

The sanctuary of an abandoned church in Cameron.

Cameron, Louisiana.

It’s the disappearance of the churches that really gets to her. “This is what finally killed this community,” she said, her voice strained. Like so much else in Cameron, the three churches there were damaged by Hurricane Laura. Pointing to the area’s shrinking population, the Catholic archdiocese chose not to rebuild. “They took our school, took the stores, took everything. And when they took our church, this community finally died,” Jones said. After years of watching the town decline, she offered a piece of advice to other communities facing LNG development: “Don’t give them 100 percent tax exemption. Don’t let them not pay school tax, at least.”

When asked what she sees when she pictures Cameron’s future, Jones looked down. She carefully smoothed the napkin on the table in front of her. “I don’t know,” she said quietly. “I don’t really want to think about it.”

Stage II: Plaquemines

Aerial view of an LNG terminal rising behind a residential community in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

At the mouth of the Mississippi River sprawls Plaquemines Parish. Much like Cameron, this is water and sky country: fragile land built up by millennia of alluvial flooding, lacy with salt marsh and also slashed through with the oil industry’s network of channels and canals. Along the single road that leads downriver, citrus orchards bloom, and crabbers and shrimpers work the water. But here, too, a darker future knocks.

“It’s the same exact story,” said Shaq Cossé, who grew up in Pointe à la Hache, a small, historically Black fishing town on the Mississippi’s east bank. Cossé expected to go into the oyster and fishing business, like his father and his grandfather. But as land loss accelerated and local fishing declined, especially after 2010’s BP oil spill, he turned to activism and eventually wound up working with Louisiana Bucket Brigade, an environmental-justice nonprofit. “This is a place that was once this thriving sportsman’s paradise. And now it’s being carved up and sold out to industry.”

Gas storage tanks under construction seen through dead trees in a marsh, with a home in between.

Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Venture Global is paving Plaquemines Parish’s marshland for LNG.

A 630-acre export terminal is under construction 24/7, its floodlights drowning out the stars, its construction crews kicking up dust.

Two additional terminals planned for the parish are awaiting federal approval.

Two additional terminals planned for the parish are awaiting federal approval.

Amid this slow-motion déjà vu, LNG opponents from across the state often collaborate. In April, a Cameron fisherman called into a meeting in Plaquemines to warn them of the fight they were facing. He counseled them about the threat of time: Wait too long, he cautioned, and you’ll all be scattered to the winds, displaced into RVs or homes inland, making it harder to organize a united front.

The danger of history repeating itself is already apparent. In both Cameron and Plaquemines, the supply of permanent housing has shrunk, while units of temporary RVs have multiplied. The RVs are mostly for construction workers, who flock into town and then leave after an LNG plant is completed. Meanwhile, homeowners abandon their properties to move inland (since there are few willing buyers) or struggle with upkeep in the face of worsening storms. Louisiana in general is seeing high rates of population loss, but near LNG terminals, that decline is accelerated. In 2022, Plaquemines experienced the fourth-highest county population decline in the nation.

Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

One factor pushing people to leave is the reduction in local services. During its first year of operation, expected to be 2025, Venture Global’s Plaquemines LNG plant will receive $83.5 million in property tax breaks, considerably more than the parish’s entire 2023 budget of $50 million. Even as the company avoids paying its share of the local government’s costs, the terminal puts increasing pressure on public services. During a water crisis last year, up to a quarter of one local district’s water was being used by Venture Global for construction. The company pulled water from municipal fire hydrants as residents downriver found themselves without enough water to bathe.

Emergency medical services have also been impacted. Current and former EMS workers in Plaquemines Parish report that medical services have been increasingly strained since the arrival of LNG. The plant has brought an influx of thousands of workers and, along with them, an enormous surge in traffic. This has increased the number of emergency calls while reducing ambulances’ ability to reach patients. At the same time, Venture Global doesn’t contribute to the funding of EMS, thanks to its tax breaks.

Chevron’s Oak Point Employee Health Center in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Scene at a construction site with netting and “Entering Wetlands” sign in foreground

Public records obtained by Sierra show that the average time for Plaquemines EMS to get from the scene of an emergency to a medical center increased from 28 minutes to 52 minutes between May 2021, around the time construction began, and May 2024. The LNG build-out is, in this sense, a thief of time.

“You have a golden hour,” said Kristine Whatley, a retired Plaquemines EMS worker, referring to the window of time to effectively treat a traumatic injury. “You need to get that person in a trauma bed in a hospital within the golden hour.” Instead, “you have people that are throwing their family members in the car because they can get there quicker than the ambulance can.”

Cement trucks parked at a facility in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Natural gas pipeline materials at a construction site in Cameron, Louisiana.

“Another shared thing that has come up recently is about hurricanes and evacuations,” Cossé said. His grandmother, he noted, evacuated the same way for 60 years, “until now,” due to the traffic and LNG infrastructure blocking certain routes. “Now there’s so much more fear and anxiety around the ability to get out, because of industry and their occupation of the parish.”

Imagine the time before the terminal was built.

It might look something like Brownsville, Texas.

Shore habitat in the Laguna Atascosa Wildlife Refuge. | Photo by wildnerdpix/ Alamy

Shore habitat in the Laguna Atascosa Wildlife Refuge. | Photo by wildnerdpix/ Alamy

Stage I: Brownsville

Hugging the Texas-Mexico border and nestled by the white-sand South Padre Island, the city of Brownsville has, for a long time, been considered the last bit of Texas coast not given over to heavy industry.

But in 2015, a company called NextDecade set its sights on building an LNG facility there.

An $18 billion export terminal, Rio Grande LNG, might someday sprawl across a three-mile strip of land between the city center and the coast.

Still in the early stages of construction—and still intensely contested by local and national organizations that hope to stop it—the LNG facility’s storage tanks and liquefaction units could end up among some of the most vibrant coastal wetlands in the country.

Across the road from the construction site is Bahia Grande, one of the continent’s greatest wetland restoration victories.

And connected to that tidal basin is Laguna Madre, one of the largest hypersaline lagoons on Earth. Herons and ibis and ducks in great flocks wade in the shallows. If Rio Grande LNG is completed, these habitats will sit in the shadow of the largest new-build energy infrastructure project in US history.

Aerial view of wetland landscape in Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, Texas. | Aerial Connection via Getty Images

Josette Cruz hopes it won’t ever be completed. Cruz grew up in Brazoria, south of Houston, and one of her earliest memories is the smell of a flare stack she passed as a child. She was often sick, wrestling with allergies, asthma, and psoriasis. When she moved to Texas City as an adult, she noticed that the air “smelled like nail polish remover.”

Those experiences began to make sense only around 2016, when she was working on Senator Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign and met Josh Fox, director of the documentary Gasland. Fox referenced the big fight against LNG underway in Texas. But Cruz said, “[I] didn’t understand the term sacrifice zone, and what it really meant, until I started reflecting on my time in Texas City. That’s when I realized.”

Residents in and around Brownsville first heard about the proposed LNG project in 2014, and very shortly thereafter began to organize against it. Cruz got involved a few years later and now works with Rebekah Hinojosa, a veteran environmental organizer, and Christopher Basaldú, a member of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe, the original residents of the area. Basaldú and Hinojosa are both former Sierra Club organizers. In 2020, they cofounded South Texas Environmental Justice Network, whose offices are located just a few blocks from the razor-wire-topped fence that marks the international boundary.

Basaldú and Hinojosa warn that if Rio Grande LNG is completed, their border community will face the same impacts already suffered by Cameron and Plaquemines Parishes in Louisiana. “The hospital in Brownsville already doesn’t have enough services for the population,” Hinojosa said. Basaldú worries that water will become a problem. “LNG really needs incredible amounts of water.”

Brownsville has long been vulnerable to drought; upon arriving at the airport, visitors are greeted by placards encouraging water conservation. “There’s been long-term drought, but particularly this year, farmers in Hidalgo County and Cameron County weren’t even allowed to plant some crops in certain areas because of the water shortage,” Basaldú said. Building a water-intensive, industrial project in a semiarid environment that’s facing temperature increases simply isn’t sustainable, he said.

Cormorants, great white pelicans, and terns fly, roost, and feed on an island in the Laguna Madre. | Photo by Bob Daemmrich/Alamy

Cormorants, great white pelicans, and terns fly, roost, and feed on an island in the Laguna Madre. | Photo by Bob Daemmrich/Alamy

According to filings from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, NextDecade anticipates using about 3.1 million gallons of water per month during construction; and then, during operation, up to 3.7 million gallons per month. That means every minute, the terminal will use 85 gallons of water—more than the average Brownsville resident uses over the course of a day. “They want the water, which we’ve never had, for industry. But they want us to not have the basics that we need,” Basaldú said.

Since NextDecade proposed the terminal, Hinojosa has fought the project from many angles, and her efforts have helped to delay the project again and again. She helped convince the insurance company Chubb and the banks Société Générale and Credit Suisse to cease underwriting the project. Those tactics successfully forced another company to cancel its planned LNG terminal in Brownsville. Organizing by Hinojosa and her allies slowed Rio Grande LNG to a near standstill: NextDecade originally said its facility would be operational by 2020. The company didn’t break ground until October 2023, and today it’s still in the early stages of construction.

It helped that in nearby Port Isabel, South Texas Environmental Justice Network found an ally in a local government official willing to oppose LNG. Port Isabel city manager Jared Hockema has been an outspoken opponent of Rio Grande LNG, attending protests against the plant and working closely on the litigation to halt it. He said politicians must hold the long-term welfare of their constituents as their lodestar and not sacrifice quality of life and the environment for industry promises. “If we ruin it, we can’t get it back,” Hockema said.

He argues that his opposition to LNG is an economic calculation, not just math of the heart: While construction jobs are portable, single moms with hospitality jobs can’t just move elsewhere. The city manager’s opposition to the project has already led to one small victory. The local school district denied NextDecade’s request for a tax abatement (though the county did approve a break for the developer’s property taxes).

More wins look possible. Hinojosa and allies, including the Sierra Club and the Carrizo/Comecrudo, scored a major victory in September when a DC district court pulled Rio Grande LNG’s federal permits. The court vacated the permits on the grounds that the company hadn’t sufficiently considered environmental-justice impacts. Construction is ongoing while the appeals process plays out, but the ruling gave anti-LNG organizers hope that the decision could set a precedent for halting projects that once seemed to have ironclad approval. A month after the decision on Rio Grande’s permits, the Southern Environmental Law Center filed a petition challenging the approval of CP2 in Cameron Parish.

If the Brownsville ruling is upheld and construction were to cease, the local advocates will have shut the door on what would have been 6 percent of US LNG exports. NextDecade is nervous. In a petition to the court in October, the company worried that “the project may collapse entirely.”

Even though there’s a flock of construction cranes already busy at work over a 1,000-acre spread of poured concrete, Hockema said the years of delays represent a victory in and of themselves. “That’s eight years our kids didn’t breathe dust, eight years they weren’t subjected to hazards,” he said. And Hockema remains hopeful—not necessarily because the plant’s opponents are winning but because they’re fighting. “It’s not about the odds. It’s about what’s at stake.”

Another Future

The Gulf marshlands are essential habitat for many bird species, including white ibis.

The Gulf marshlands are essential habitat for many bird species, including white ibis.

Many LNG opponents always assumed that no matter the election outcome, they would still be involved in an intense political battle. “No administration’s gonna save us,” Hinojosa said in the fall. “We’re the ones who have each other’s backs.” While Trump’s victory certainly made the future darker, Hinojosa, for one, was largely unfazed—in large part because she has spent so many years fighting LNG during both Republican and Democratic administrations. “We’ve been resisting LNG in the [Rio Grande] Valley for over 10 years,” she said the week after Trump’s ballot box victory. “Communities on the ground need support now more than ever.”

Hinojosa and her allies believe it’s the locals—the fishers, the mothers, longtime residents and immigrants alike—who are key to saving the future of this region, with all its beauty and salt. Pride of place will help fuel the fights still to come. Such pride was visible one warm October evening, as shrimpers and fishers stood waist-deep in the bath-warm waters of the Bahia Grande wetlands and worked for a catch. Pelicans winged their way low across the water as white egrets, bills tucked under wing, slept where they stood. A man held up the fine mesh of his shrimp net and shouted gleefully in Spanish to his daughter on the shore.

Behind her, across the road, towered the blinking red lights of cranes, poised to continue building the terminal in the morning. And in the other direction? In the distance, faint against the pink dusk, a dozen wind turbines spun.

There is another kind of future, just across the water. It’s hard to reach. But it isn’t too late to get there.

What You Can Do

Call on federal officials to halt dangerous gas exports: sc.org/ban-lng.