Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?
Backtrack
Sierra Main
In This Section

  July/August 2001 Issue
  Features: Brave New Nature
Sowing Technology
Spinning Science into Gold
A Nation of Lab Rats
Along Came a Spider
 
Other Features:
Moments of Truth
Why I Hunt
 
  Departments:
Letters
Inside Sierra
Ways & Means
Lay of the Land
The Hidden Life
Good Going
Profile
Bulletin: News for Members
Home Front
Mixed Media
 
Back Issues
Information
Submission Guidelines
Advertising Guidelines
Contact Us
Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend

BIOTECH BRIEF

Genetically engineered trees

Transgenic trees are being field-tested in 17 countries, including Australia, France, Chile, and Indonesia. In the United States, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has issued permits for more than 300 trials since 1987.

The Promise: Timber companies are eager to create trees that grow faster and straighter and require fewer chemicals and less energy to pulp. Doing so, they argue, could also reduce their industry’s reliance on logging national forests and other treasured areas. Trees could be engineered to grow in polluted landfills and absorb poisons, or even be designed to capture more carbon dioxide, diminishing global warming. Scientists are also using genetic-engineering techniques to bring the American chestnut back to the eastern United States, where its population was decimated by the imported chestnut-blight fungus in the late 1930s.

The Peril: A tree plantation doesn’t carry out the same ecological functions as a diverse natural forest. One type of “designer tree” being developed by Shell and Monsanto would grow faster--and produce more timber--because it would be devoid of seeds, flowers, pollen, and fruits. That’s good for the corporate bottom line, but not the food chain. Genetically engineered trees that still do produce pollen could cross with native varieties, altering forest ecosystems for miles around. Since trees take up to 100 years to mature, many critics argue that it is essentially impossible to foresee the long-term effects.

To Learn More: Visit the Web sites of World Wide Fund for Nature International and the American Lands Alliance, which have both produced detailed reports on the use of genetic-engineering techniques in forestry.

BIOTECH BRIEFS:
FAST-GROWING FISH
HERBICIDE-RESISTANT LAWNS
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED TREES

Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club